Ifri’s Research Defense Unit just published the number 65 of the Focus stratégique collection:
Guillaume Lasconjarias works for the research unit of the NATO in Rome. His last book is about hybrid wars and is called : NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats (Rome, NDC Forum Paper, 2015).
Born into the Cold War, the very notion of ‘reassurance’ was revived in the wake of the 2014 Ukraine crisis as NATO had to label the measures destined to reassert the lasting relevance of collective defense towards its member states. This has led to an increased role for land forces, despite the serious political, economic and operational difficulties involved. NATO has striven to revitalize its concept of rapid response by means of the VJTF, however, some issues remain unsolved regarding the range of actions to be undertaken in order to uphold reassurance as a lasting principle. The main problem is related to the delicate balance to be maintained between a posture of firmness – based on rapid reaction capacities – and a risk of escalation associated with potential worsening of tensions. For land forces, this translates into a return towards the know-how and practice that two decades of expeditionary warfare have kept out of the picture.
Table of contents
La “réassurance” ou l’éternel retour des concepts
La réassurance avant la réassurance
Une redécouverte par nécessité
Un arsenal de mesures trop limité?
Les options pour une réassurance durable